why driving on the left may be safer
The world is divided into those who drive on the left, and those who drive on the right, apparently in a proportion of one third to two thirds. Although surely it would be more convenient if we all drove on the same side, the choice, made in the past, to go for one or the other, has now been carved into the landscape and could not easily be changed. Does this difference matter? Certainly it imposes costs on car manufacturers, and there are costs also in human effort and, perhaps, in accidents as people abroad, accustomed to driving on one side, have to adapt to driving on the other. These costs would almost certainly be exceeded by those resulting from changing the handedness of all the roads across a whole country – both in money, and in accidents as an entire population adapted to their new roads.
Now this point may seem a tad trivial – after all, right and left handedness is a matter of statistics, even in the individual: studies have shown that there are many tasks in which a right/left choice has to be made – from writing by hand, to unscrewing the top off a jar – and that, across this range of tasks, a right hander will not always preferentially use his right hand; each individual thus having a more or less fixed pattern of right and left hand use across a range of tasks. No doubt, as left handers do manage to adapt to a right handed world, anyone is capable of learning to be proficient at changing gears with whatever hand he is required to use by dint of where he learns to drive.
However, a more profound aspect to this lies in the functional asymmetry in our brains: brain functions seem to be unevenly distributed between our left and right hemispheres with a specific distribution that is even found in most left handers. The preference we have, to use one hand or the other for this task or that, derives from this asymmetry, but is by no means its only consequence.
From my understanding of Iain McGilchrist’s book The Master and his Emissary, the right hemisphere perceives the world as a whole, is deeply attuned to the particular, the individual, the immediate; and has no problem with ambiguity and paradox, with complexity and unknowability. The left hemisphere, by contrast, is obsessed with abstraction, with wheedling out underlying geometries, with generalities; what it perceives it dissects and analyses. It focuses on what it knows and seeks certainty and single, definitive answers.
Now it seems that the left hemisphere is strictly aware only of the right half of our field of view, whereas the right hemisphere is aware of the entire field (even though it specifically controls the left eye). So, for example, if you are driving on the left it is the left hemisphere that is aware of oncoming traffic; if you are driving on the right, it is the right hemisphere that performs this role. This is only one implication, I’m sure you can think of others.
This all suggests to me some interesting questions. Could it be, for example, part of the explanation for the different way that people drive in right-traffic and left-traffic countries? Is driving on one side of the road inherently safer than driving on the other?
Disclaimer: I know that the photos prove nothing – I only wish I had found more amusing ones to, tongue in cheek, illustrate my thesis
5 Replies to “why driving on the left may be safer”
I’ve lived 20 years of my adult life driving on the right and 20 years driving on the left so I’m fairly experienced in both. Until I lived in New Zealand, I nearly always drove manual “stick shift” cars.
I find it more “natural” to drive on the left, oncoming vehicles passing on our dominant side. I also walk to the left and go up escalators on the left.
When driving, both hands are on the wheel. When changing gear, my dominant right holds the wheel which needs constant control while my left hand changes gear. I’ve driven on some rough roads in my time without power steering, anyone who has hit a pothole with only their left hand on the wheel will know the feel of sudden loss of control.
Reversing is also easier with the right hand on the wheel looking over the left shoulder.
Of course, while the reasons for driving on the left were valid, most people nowadays never drive on a rough road and automatic transmission means no need to change gears.
I am British, but retired to France when I was 64. I brought my UK Jeep with me. The French drive badly in three major respects. They hog the middle of the road. They tail-gate. They race along country roads on the their phones. Women do this more than men.
I prefer to drive my RHD car in France, as I can register the edge of the road easily. Having had the occasion to drive a LHD car from time to time, I have the devil’s own job trying to reference the kerb/verge. I think that this a left/right brain thing.
If I bought a new car, it would be RHD as I feel so much safer driving RHD on the right hand side of the road.
Sorry but the suggestion that gearing requires our dominant hand? Surely steering is the more difficult and intricate task.
Supposedly when Sweden changed from being a LHD to RHD country overnight, the accident rate went down for a year as everyone was driving more cautiously.
After a bit of further thinking on this, I wonder if the right brain is differently engaged when the visual field differs with respect to road boundaries. Avoiding collisions is not all just about calculating impact geometries – there’s also the matter of giving way to oncoming traffic on narrower roads or where the driving conditions are less optimal.
I’ve now spent a good amount of time driving all four combinations of LHD and RHD cars in LHD and RHD countries. Sometimes I’ve felt safer driving my RHD (British/Australian) car around LHD Europe than a LHD vehicle, simply because I can negotiate the shoulder edge of the road better and avoid the riskier centre.