Jung’s Red Book…

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

pages from Jung's Red Book

pages from Jung's Red Book


page from Jung's Red Book

page from Jung's Red Book


page from Jung's Red Book

page from Jung's Red Book

I first read Jung when perhaps halfway through writing “The Standing Dead”. It was like coming home. Through him I came to a completely new understanding of what it was I was doing with the Stone Dance. That I discovered that my work was packed full of what he terms ‘archetypes’, convinced me that his theory of the ‘collective unconscious’ must be true – how else to explain the archetypes being there…? It was a strange, exhilarating experience; to suddenly discover how, all the time I had been ‘constructing’ the book with my conscious mind, my unconscious had been delving far deeper foundations and flows. This explained, of course, the peculiar and visceral connection there was between my dreams and the books. It explained also where whence so many disturbing images and scenes were emerging. It also revealed to me – and this was a tad shocking – that the books were deeply autobiographical. A sort of ‘mythological’ autobiography. Finally, Jung explained why it was that some of my readers were so powerfully struck by the books. As I’ve written elsewhere, my feelings had little to with pride, but rather with a humility that all this – that is common to us all – had channeled through me into my work. It gave me an understanding of why I was making the Stone Dance – why I had needed to make it – why it was worth making. None of these reasons had anything to with fame or money – of which the books have brought me pitifully little *grin*

Now, reading Jung I have found akin to attempting the interpretation of a dream – that as you try to grasp it, it either slips through your fingers, more elusive than water – or it tightens down to a pellet, hard and lifeless. I don’t ‘understand’ Jung as much as feel it. His works can be daunting, impenetrable… And then the Red Book suddenly appears. And it is claimed that it is the source of all Jung’s other work – though not delivered as an abstruse, technical treatise, but simply. And, bizarrely, the Red Book is filled with his own, exquisite drawings (Jung spent much time on focusing on manadalas – drawings produced by his patients that he interpreted therapeutically) and accompanied by meticulous calligraphy. Like a bible illuminated by some monk in the Middle Ages. How strange. A telling of his own struggle and exploration with his own psyche from which all his insights emerged. Even as I write this, it seems like some Hollywood conceit – something by Dan Brown… but apparently it is… real…

Tags: , , , , ,
No Comments Yet

University of Edinburgh Freshercon…

Friday, September 18th, 2009
speech card...

speech card...

It was only when I arrived outside the venue for this event that it occurred to me that I should have announced it here, on my blog. Not entirely sure why I didn’t… Apologies if you might have wanted to be there but weren’t…

This talk was specifically for freshers (students coming to university for the first time) with a view of encouraging them to join the university’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Society. It was well attended. I read some stuff from the various Stone Dance books and talked a little about who I was and how I had got into writing…

I talked about Tolkien and Moorcock: how the former inspired me by his method and approach; how the latter reinforced my own desires to escape from the tyranny exercised by ‘feudal Europe’ over fantasy. I talked about how dated Tolkien’s ‘black hat/ white hat’ characterisations can be – that though this polarized view of reality might perhaps be natural to people living through the two World Wars and who were still deeply influenced by Christian dualism, but that today I felt it necessary to take a more subtle, nuanced position. I touched on Dune, Ursula le Guin, Ray Bradbury and Gene Wolf. Then I moved to discussing the renaissance that seems to be occurring in speculative fiction generally.

Finally I launched into backing up a claim that speculative fiction could be seen to at the centre of our culture – and rightly so… My basic argument went like this. It seems to me that sci-fi explores possible evolutions of our cultural envelope in a cognitive projection from where we are now, on into the future… Fantasy on the other hand explores the inner world of our psyche. I talked here a bit about Jung’s archetypes and his notion of the collective unconsciousness – the deployment of which makes a story about everyone, and no one in particular. I pointed out that, in some ways, these two categories are pointless as there is much fantasy that appears to be sci-fi (Star Wars being an example) and sci-fi that may appear to be fantasy (the Stone Dance being an example…), that what really mattered was that the reader lay at the heart of these categories… perhaps even squeezed between their boundary as a fluid mix of her/his internal and external worlds… her/his present between the future and the familial past… I then railed a little at the ‘speculative’ ghetto… and pointed out the rather interesting fact that the only area in which fantasy/sci-fi is not a second class citizen is in children’s books: Harry Potter, Pullman, for example… is this not, perhaps, suggestive?: that in a world that is changing faster all the time, those who remain childlike longer – curious, learning, adapting – will cope the best… Thus it seemed to me that it is speculative fiction that best addresses the issues of the ‘now’ and can provide insight, guidance and, even, consolation…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
No Comments Yet