<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: travel&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/</link>
	<description>the blog of author Ricardo Pinto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/?p=734#comment-570</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more about the tourists who insist on squinting at their holiday location through the lens of a camera...! It&#039;s as if they&#039;re afraid to see anything with their &#039;naked eyes&#039;... Your point about it replacing the &quot;cultural lense&quot; is an excellent one... Your fascinating experiences in Japan resonate with mine elsewhere... you&#039;ve evoked it very well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more about the tourists who insist on squinting at their holiday location through the lens of a camera&#8230;! It&#8217;s as if they&#8217;re afraid to see anything with their &#8216;naked eyes&#8217;&#8230; Your point about it replacing the &#8220;cultural lense&#8221; is an excellent one&#8230; Your fascinating experiences in Japan resonate with mine elsewhere&#8230; you&#8217;ve evoked it very well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athena</title>
		<link>http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Athena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/?p=734#comment-568</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ll quote you from now: &#039;travelling narrows the mind&#039;. A great revision for the 21st Century. It describes how I feel about the travel fad now - how many people go to a place to take a photo in front of it, and contribute to ruining the atmosphere because they couldn&#039;t care less about anything else other than proving they had been there (not even that they had properly seen the thing). More sadly, the brief encounter that these tourists have become their point of justifying a narrow view when they return home. Ironically, it seems to have replaced the old &#039;cultural lense&#039;/propaganda/bias phenomenon.

On another note, while I agree with the disappointment that often comes with seeing a ruin in reality now that HD Discovery or BBC has a much closer look without the horrendous crowds, I think it also works vice versa in that many ruins or relics of the past that are skipped over can be absolutely breathtaking. My family and I experienced a similarly disappointing encounter with a shrine in Nara, Japan that was one of the highlights after walking for quite a while through the deer park: it was cheeply redone and its being among the ancient Shinto lanterns made of stone all over simply highlighted how badly it stuck out as a (small, but irritating) eyesore. Ironically, the stone lanterns actually mesmerized me much more as they lead our way through the huge park. It was like walking back in time, and it wasn&#039;t difficult to feel the spirituality when they lit up at night, flickering silently amidst the darkness. As we wandered our way through the rest of the park, we came across many other temples and shrines. The best one is not found on most of the websites, is free, and has a spectacular view of the city and great original props. The Todaji temple that most people go to - surprisingly - was impressive enough to withstand the hordes of tourists.

An even more impressive find was in a local little street in Fukuoka, in the south of Japan, when we stumbled upon what we thought was just a little local shrine. It turned out to be the main shrine that held all the festival props and carriages - hand made of gold. There was almost no one there, since the locals have likely seen it every year with every festival, and the tourists aren&#039;t aware of it&#039;s existance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ll quote you from now: &#8216;travelling narrows the mind&#8217;. A great revision for the 21st Century. It describes how I feel about the travel fad now &#8211; how many people go to a place to take a photo in front of it, and contribute to ruining the atmosphere because they couldn&#8217;t care less about anything else other than proving they had been there (not even that they had properly seen the thing). More sadly, the brief encounter that these tourists have become their point of justifying a narrow view when they return home. Ironically, it seems to have replaced the old &#8216;cultural lense&#8217;/propaganda/bias phenomenon.</p>
<p>On another note, while I agree with the disappointment that often comes with seeing a ruin in reality now that HD Discovery or BBC has a much closer look without the horrendous crowds, I think it also works vice versa in that many ruins or relics of the past that are skipped over can be absolutely breathtaking. My family and I experienced a similarly disappointing encounter with a shrine in Nara, Japan that was one of the highlights after walking for quite a while through the deer park: it was cheeply redone and its being among the ancient Shinto lanterns made of stone all over simply highlighted how badly it stuck out as a (small, but irritating) eyesore. Ironically, the stone lanterns actually mesmerized me much more as they lead our way through the huge park. It was like walking back in time, and it wasn&#8217;t difficult to feel the spirituality when they lit up at night, flickering silently amidst the darkness. As we wandered our way through the rest of the park, we came across many other temples and shrines. The best one is not found on most of the websites, is free, and has a spectacular view of the city and great original props. The Todaji temple that most people go to &#8211; surprisingly &#8211; was impressive enough to withstand the hordes of tourists.</p>
<p>An even more impressive find was in a local little street in Fukuoka, in the south of Japan, when we stumbled upon what we thought was just a little local shrine. It turned out to be the main shrine that held all the festival props and carriages &#8211; hand made of gold. There was almost no one there, since the locals have likely seen it every year with every festival, and the tourists aren&#8217;t aware of it&#8217;s existance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/?p=734#comment-564</guid>
		<description>hurrah! We&#039;re both right!! *grin*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hurrah! We&#8217;re both right!! *grin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rem</title>
		<link>http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Rem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/?p=734#comment-563</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean... And it&#039;s indeed depending on how one&#039;s imagination works. I think both your way of viewing things and mine are equally valid therefore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean&#8230; And it&#8217;s indeed depending on how one&#8217;s imagination works. I think both your way of viewing things and mine are equally valid therefore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/2009/10/28/travel/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ricardopinto.com/blog/?p=734#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s just the way my imagination works. I have been thinking about the Pyramids since I was a child... so that when I approached it in reality (admittedly, at the age of 22 when I was somewhat preoccupied with my hormones), it just seemed like a hill... The Pyramids are in a class of their own: they&#039;re so immense that the mind moves them from the category &#039;building&#039; to the category &#039;landscape&#039;... In Egypt, my greatest disappointment was with the great hypostyle hall in the Temple of Karnak. This was another place I had been reading about all my life. I was actually standing in it, and looking for it - the reason being that I had imagined the columns to be so much MORE massive... The issue is, I feel, that we are accustomed to buildings on a scale that the Ancients (barring the Pyramid, as already mentioned) could barely imagine... The critical thing about Karnak, for example, is just how massive it was at the time it was built. To actually even &#039;approach&#039; that mindset, one has to use one&#039;s imagination. Confronted by the reality of Karnak, the imagination is overwhelmed by the &#039;realness&#039;... and so the real Karnak is decidedly inferior to the Karnak in my mind&#039;s eye...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just the way my imagination works. I have been thinking about the Pyramids since I was a child&#8230; so that when I approached it in reality (admittedly, at the age of 22 when I was somewhat preoccupied with my hormones), it just seemed like a hill&#8230; The Pyramids are in a class of their own: they&#8217;re so immense that the mind moves them from the category &#8216;building&#8217; to the category &#8216;landscape&#8217;&#8230; In Egypt, my greatest disappointment was with the great hypostyle hall in the Temple of Karnak. This was another place I had been reading about all my life. I was actually standing in it, and looking for it &#8211; the reason being that I had imagined the columns to be so much MORE massive&#8230; The issue is, I feel, that we are accustomed to buildings on a scale that the Ancients (barring the Pyramid, as already mentioned) could barely imagine&#8230; The critical thing about Karnak, for example, is just how massive it was at the time it was built. To actually even &#8216;approach&#8217; that mindset, one has to use one&#8217;s imagination. Confronted by the reality of Karnak, the imagination is overwhelmed by the &#8216;realness&#8217;&#8230; and so the real Karnak is decidedly inferior to the Karnak in my mind&#8217;s eye&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

